Comment on the Official Blog Post link below and Help kill a Troll in Auckland City immediately: http://thecorner.co.nz/2013/09/09/great-sounds-great-bad-sounds-bad-the-neo-kalashnikovs-gorgeous-baby/
‘Gorgeous Baby’
Great Sounds Great; Bad Sounds
Bad is a column which sees a panel of writers for The Corner review a
range of local singles and grade them out of 10. Check out the song
below, read through their opinions and let us know in the comments
section your own thoughts and what you’d like to see reviewed next time
around.
[Grade: 5.3]
Alex Lyall: Wow
Coronation Street just got sex-ay. There’s no reason why they had to go
to that trouble to get Rosie Webster but there she is strutting and
smoking. I think that was the mindset behind the song too, they’ll make a
song just because y’know. I say this because the entire time nothing
memorable happens, same tone, same lyrics. No risk, no depth. The
repetition feels less like emphasis and more like a piece of propaganda.
‘All hail the gorgeous baby.’ [3]
Robyn Gallagher: I like
this song for its lazy, sexy charms. The song doesn’t have much more to
say other than the frequently repeated line “my God you’re gorgeous
baby”, but sometimes that’s all that needs to be said. The thick fuzzy
guitar and Volita’s bright vocals create plenty of sultry atmosphere.
But none of that matters because of the utterly insane (and therefore
brilliant) music video. Starring ex-Corrie actress and current UK
tabloid hot mess Helen Flanagan, the video sees her pouting around a
country house while lip-syncing the song. This is either an utterly
genius career move for the Neo-Kalashnikovs or for Ms Flanagan, but not
both. [6]
Eden Bradfield: Man!
This video has a lot of views! Apparently the girl in the video is
famous or something. It’s an okay song that goes on too long- only so
many times one can repeat “..you’re gorgeous baby” unless one was David
Lynch and putting it through a voice processor, which could actually be
entertaining. Probably a longer song works to their advantage so the
166K people who’ve seen it can see more footage of Helen whatsherface.
As a song it’s a bit weak, but it’s a publicity coup d’état. [4]
Luke Jacobs: Ignore the
video. It is terrible. I didn’t know who Helen Flanagan was before it
and after it I know nothing. So just stay away. The song ain’t bad but
damn does it stick around for way too long. There is so much repetition
of a single line and idea it could have been 2 minutes long and
smoldered for that time and been perfectly good.
I guess whatever charm it had worked
because I listened to the rest of the EP and I can say it’s better and
this single is a bit weak compared to the rest of the material they
have. The production on their other songs is better too, much less
emphasis on the vocals and a hotter sound. The rhythm section sizzles in
the EP but on this track it kind of sounds muted. There is potential
here but right now we are coasting to average town. [5]
Elizabeth Beattie: The
song has decent dynamics, the musical simplicity is quite appealing. The
vocals are really excellent, well executed and they compliment the
instrumental passages well. This song has an early 90s trancey quality
to it, reminiscent of the Breeders while still remaining modern at the
same time. I do however wish the lyrics were a little more artful and
complex - after a few listens I really felt like I wanted there to be
more of them. But I like the mood this track creates and think it’s a
pretty decent single. [7]
Alex Braae: While I
wasn’t particularly impressed by the lack of punch in this recording, I
have no doubt this song would be incredible live. Perfectly simple
melodically, with a fantastic drum pattern underpinning it, this song
should be remade when the band has access to better technology. In a
dark room, smoke machine, too crowded with drinks being spilled by a
heaving crowd, the hooks of ‘Gorgeous Baby’ would sweep people up like
puppets on strings. As it is in the present form though, it’s just
potential. Frustratingly, not quite realised potential. [6]
Eamonn Marra: Nice
guitar tone. The harmony in the chorus is really good too. The vocals
are a bit high in the mix, and the production is a bit slick, but that
is just a personal preference thing. I was hoping this would go
somewhere, but it didn’t really do anything. It just stagnated with this
one idea for a bit too long. It would be nicer if it were half as long.
It’s not a bad song, it just lost its appeal by the end of it. [6]
Michael Kerby: Sleep
inducing. Which is, I guess, part of the vibe — a sort of fuzzed-up
Cowboy Junkies. But, while nice, (and actually a bit of an earworm) it’s
missing some crucial item of interest. I have no desire to ever listen
to it again, or to return to whatever languid world they just fell short
of conjuring up. It’s certainly a catchy bastard, though. [5]
Nick Braae: The
individual components of ‘Gorgeous Baby’ are strong. There’s the main
groove, with its menacing battle between a straight kick-drum pattern
and syncopated guitar and snare riff; there’s the lovely blending of the
voices; and there’s the sultry, bluesy melody. But they don’t quite
coalesce into a strong song, probably because there is so much
repetition of the ideas. It’s a shame really; a little variation in
structure and dynamic level, and this would have been a killer track. [6]
No comments:
Post a Comment